Core i7-5600U vs Opteron X3418

Core i7-5600U vs Opteron X3418 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-5600U

2 / 4

3,011

0.0%

3,043

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-5600U vs Opteron X3418 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-5600U vs Opteron X3418: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-5600U

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,011 vs 3,043).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron X3418, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

Opteron X3418

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron X3418 better than Core i7-5600U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron X3418 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-5600U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron X3418 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron X3418 still makes the most sense overall. Opteron X3418 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron X3418 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-5600U vs Opteron X3418 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-5600U

The Core i7-5600U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,011 points. Launch price was $393.

Opteron X3418

The Opteron X3418 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,043 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-5600U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron X3418 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron X3418 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-5600U versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron X3418 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i7-5600U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron X3418 uses Excavator (2017−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-5600U scores 3,011 against the Opteron X3418's 3,043 — a 1.1% lead for the Opteron X3418.

Feature	Core i7-5600U	Opteron X3418
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+44%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (total)
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-U (2015)	Excavator (2017−2018)
PassMark	3,011	3,043+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-5600U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron X3418 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.