
Core i7-5650U

PRO A10-8770E
Core i7-5650U vs PRO A10-8770E Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-5650U vs PRO A10-8770E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-5650U vs PRO A10-8770E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-5650U
2015Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A10-8770E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,000 vs 3,001).
- ❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
PRO A10-8770E
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $395 MSRP, while Core i7-5650U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is PRO A10-8770E better than Core i7-5650U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-5650U vs PRO A10-8770E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-5650U
The Core i7-5650U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,000 points. Launch price was $426.

PRO A10-8770E
The PRO A10-8770E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,001 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i7-5650U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A10-8770E offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A10-8770E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-5650U versus 3.5 GHz on the PRO A10-8770E — a 12.1% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8770E (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-5650U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the PRO A10-8770E uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-5650U scores 3,000 against the PRO A10-8770E's 3,001 — a 0% lead for the PRO A10-8770E.
| Feature | Core i7-5650U | PRO A10-8770E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2048 kB+700% |
| Process | 14 nm-50% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell-U (2015) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| PassMark | 3,000 | 3,001 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-5650U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A10-8770E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-5650U | PRO A10-8770E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















