Core i7-5775R vs Core i7-5950HQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-5775R vs Core i7-5950HQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-5775R vs Core i7-5950HQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-5775R

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,598 vs 7,667).
❌38.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 47W.

Core i7-5950HQ

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 47W instead of 65W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-5775R across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-5950HQ better than Core i7-5775R?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-5775R is ahead with a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-5950HQ pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-5950HQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-5950HQ still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-5950HQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-5950HQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-5775R vs Core i7-5950HQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-5775R

The Core i7-5775R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 May 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 7,598 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-5950HQ

The Core i7-5950HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-H (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,667 points. Launch price was $623.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-5775R and Core i7-5950HQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-5775R versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-5950HQ — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-5775R uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-5950HQ uses Broadwell-H (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-5775R scores 7,598 against the Core i7-5950HQ's 7,667 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-5950HQ. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-5775R	Core i7-5950HQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+14%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Broadwell-H (2015)
PassMark	7,598	7,667