Core i7-5930K vs Xeon E5-2660 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-5930K vs Xeon E5-2660 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-5930K vs Xeon E5-2660 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-5930K

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $810 less on MSRP ($583 MSRP vs $1,393 MSRP).
✅Delivers 139.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.8 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($583 MSRP vs $1,393 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2660 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2660 v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌47.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 95W.

Xeon E5-2660 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 15 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
✅Draws 95W instead of 140W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,353 vs 10,369).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($1,393 MSRP vs $583 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-5930K better than Xeon E5-2660 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2660 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-5930K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-5930K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-5930K is the better buy right now. Core i7-5930K comes in $810 cheaper on MSRP at $583 MSRP versus $1,393 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2660 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 10.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 139.3% better value on MSRP (17.8 vs 7.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-5930K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-5930K vs Xeon E5-2660 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-5930K

The Core i7-5930K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-E (2014) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,369 points. Launch price was $613.

Xeon E5-2660 v2

The Xeon E5-2660 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,353 points. Launch price was $850.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-5930K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2660 v2 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2660 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-5930K versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2660 v2 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-5930K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-5930K uses the Haswell-E (2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2660 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-5930K scores 10,369 against the Xeon E5-2660 v2's 10,353 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-5930K. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-5930K vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2660 v2.

Feature	Core i7-5930K	Xeon E5-2660 v2
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+23%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+59%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	15 MB (total)	25 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell-E (2014)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	10,369	10,353
Geekbench 6 Single	1,000	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	6,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i7-5930K versus DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2660 v2 — the Core i7-5930K supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2660 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 40 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: X99 (Core i7-5930K) and Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2660 v2).

Feature	Core i7-5930K	Xeon E5-2660 v2
Socket	LGA2011	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+14%	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	768 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	4	4
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	40	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-5930K) / not specified (Xeon E5-2660 v2). Primary use case: Core i7-5930K targets High End Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-5930K rivals Ryzen 5 1600.

Feature	Core i7-5930K	Xeon E5-2660 v2
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	High End Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-5930K was priced at $583, while the Xeon E5-2660 v2 came in at $1393. On launch pricing ($583 vs $1393), Core i7-5930K was $810 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-5930K delivers 17.8 pts/$ vs 7.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2660 v2 — making the Core i7-5930K the 82.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-5930K	Xeon E5-2660 v2
MSRP	$583-58%	$1393
Performance per Dollar	17.8+141%	7.4
Release Date	2014	2013

Search Core i7-5930K on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2660 v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.