Core i7-640LM
VS
Core Duo T2250

Core i7-640LM vs Core Duo T2250

Intel

Core i7-640LM

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.93 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core Duo T2250

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-640LM is positioned at rank 333 and the Core Duo T2250 is on rank 3, so the Core Duo T2250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-640LM

#321
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
480%
#322
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
473%
#323
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
434%
#324
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
432%
#325
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
428%
#327
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
413%
#328
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
396%
#329
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
396%
#330
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
385%
#333
Core i7-640LM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#336
Xeon E3-1505M v5
MSRP: $115|Avg: $115
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2250

#3
Core Duo T2250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
95%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
94%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
86%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
86%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
85%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
82%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
79%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
79%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
77%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
71%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-640LM leads in gaming performance. However, the Core Duo T2250 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-640LMCore Duo T2250
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-640LMCore Duo T2250
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-640LM and Core Duo T2250

Intel

Core i7-640LM

The Core i7-640LM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,529 points. Launch price was $332.

Intel

Core Duo T2250

The Core Duo T2250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,537 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Core i7-640LM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core Duo T2250's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.93 GHz on the Core i7-640LM versus 1.7 GHz on the Core Duo T2250 — a 53.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-640LM (base: 2.13 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The Core i7-640LM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core Duo T2250 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-640LM scores 1,529 against the Core Duo T2250's 1,537 — a 0.5% lead for the Core Duo T2250. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-640LM vs 0 kB on the Core Duo T2250.

FeatureCore i7-640LMCore Duo T2250
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.93 GHz+72%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.13 GHz+23%
1.73 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark
1,529
1,537
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-640LM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Duo T2250 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-640LMCore Duo T2250
Socket
BGA1288
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1066
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-640LM) / not specified (Core Duo T2250). The Core i7-640LM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Core Duo T2250 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-640LM rivals Core 2 Duo SL9400.

FeatureCore i7-640LMCore Duo T2250
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true