Core i7-6560U vs FX-4150

Core i7-6560U vs FX-4150 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-6560U

2 / 4

3,347

+0.6%

3,327

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6560U vs FX-4150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6560U vs FX-4150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6560U

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-4150 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

FX-4150

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,327 vs 3,347).
❌Launch MSRP is still $137 MSRP, while Core i7-6560U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6560U better than FX-4150?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-4150 is ahead with a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6560U pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. FX-4150 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6560U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-6560U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-6560U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $137 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. FX-4150 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (24.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-6560U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-6560U vs FX-4150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6560U

The Core i7-6560U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,347 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-4150

The FX-4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,327 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-6560U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4150 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4150 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-6560U versus 4 GHz on the FX-4150 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the FX-4150 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-6560U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-4150 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6560U scores 3,347 against the FX-4150's 3,327 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-6560U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-6560U vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-4150.

Feature	Core i7-6560U	FX-4150
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4 GHz+25%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.8 GHz+73%
L3 Cache	4 MB	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	4 MB+700%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	3,347	3,327

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6560U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4150 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.