Core i7-6650U vs PRO A10-8770

Intel

Core i7-6650U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

PRO A10-8770

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-6650U vs PRO A10-8770 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6650U vs PRO A10-8770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6650U vs PRO A10-8770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6650U

2015

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A10-8770 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

PRO A10-8770

2016

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,547 vs 3,557).
  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6650U better than PRO A10-8770?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A10-8770 is ahead with a 11.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6650U pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6650U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-6650U still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-6650U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
PRO A10-8770 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-6650U vs PRO A10-8770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-6650U

The Core i7-6650U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,557 points. Launch price was $415.

AMD

PRO A10-8770

The PRO A10-8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,547 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i7-6650U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A10-8770 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A10-8770 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-6650U versus 3.8 GHz on the PRO A10-8770 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8770 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-6650U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the PRO A10-8770 uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6650U scores 3,557 against the PRO A10-8770's 3,547 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-6650U.

FeatureCore i7-6650UPRO A10-8770
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+59%
L3 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
2048 kB+300%
Process
14 nm-50%
28 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark
3,557
3,547
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6650U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A10-8770 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-6650UPRO A10-8770
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0