
Core i7-6800K

Xeon E5-4655 v4
Core i7-6800K vs Xeon E5-4655 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-6800K vs Xeon E5-4655 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-6800K vs Xeon E5-4655 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-6800K
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,182 less on MSRP ($434 MSRP vs $4,616 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 944.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.7 vs 2.4 PassMark/$ ($434 MSRP vs $4,616 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4655 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,715 vs 10,912).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4655 v4, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-4655 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅Draws 135W instead of 140W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 24.7 PassMark/$ ($4,616 MSRP vs $434 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-4655 v4 better than Core i7-6800K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-6800K vs Xeon E5-4655 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6800K
The Core i7-6800K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-E (2016) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,715 points. Launch price was $345.

Xeon E5-4655 v4
The Xeon E5-4655 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,912 points. Launch price was $4,616.
Processing Power
The Core i7-6800K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4655 v4 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4655 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-6800K versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4655 v4 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-6800K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-6800K uses the Broadwell-E (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4655 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6800K scores 10,715 against the Xeon E5-4655 v4's 10,912 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon E5-4655 v4. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-6800K vs 30 MB on the Xeon E5-4655 v4.
| Feature | Core i7-6800K | Xeon E5-4655 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+19% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+36% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 15 MB (total) | 30 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell-E (2016) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 10,715 | 10,912+2% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i7-6800K | Xeon E5-4655 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1536 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-6800K) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-4655 v4). Primary use case: Xeon E5-4655 v4 targets Server.
| Feature | Core i7-6800K | Xeon E5-4655 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-6800K was priced at $434, while the Xeon E5-4655 v4 came in at $4616. On launch pricing ($434 vs $4616), Core i7-6800K was $4182 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6800K delivers 24.7 pts/$ vs 2.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4655 v4 — making the Core i7-6800K the 165% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-6800K | Xeon E5-4655 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $434-91% | $4616 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.7+929% | 2.4 |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














