Core i7-6820HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

Core i7-6820HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G Performance Spectrum

Core i7-6820HQ

4 / 8

6,758

+1.5%

6,661

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6820HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6820HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6820HQ

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-6820HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,661 vs 6,758).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Core i7-6820HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6820HQ better than Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G?

Yes. Core i7-6820HQ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 13.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-6820HQ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6820HQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-6820HQ is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i7-6820HQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 6,661 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-6820HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6820HQ

The Core i7-6820HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,758 points. Launch price was $378.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,661 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-6820HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-6820HQ versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-6820HQ. The Core i7-6820HQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6820HQ scores 6,758 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G's 6,661 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i7-6820HQ. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-6820HQ vs 4 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G.

Feature	Core i7-6820HQ	Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+3%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB+100%	4 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	6,758+1%	6,661

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6820HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.