Core i7-6820HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

Intel

Core i7-6820HQ

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 4 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-6820HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6820HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6820HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6820HQ

2015

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (6,758 vs 6,813).
  • 28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

2019

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-6820HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Core i7-6820HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE better than Core i7-6820HQ?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-6820HQ is ahead with a 11.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Core i7-6820HQ also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $99 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-6820HQ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (68.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-6820HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-6820HQ

The Core i7-6820HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,758 points. Launch price was $378.

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,813 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-6820HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-6820HQ versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-6820HQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6820HQ scores 6,758 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE's 6,813 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-6820HQ vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE.

FeatureCore i7-6820HQRyzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
4 GHz+11%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
3.3 GHz+22%
L3 Cache
8 MB+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
12 nm-14%
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark
6,758
6,813
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6820HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-6820HQRyzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0