Core i7-6920HQ vs Processor 300

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6920HQ vs Processor 300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6920HQ vs Processor 300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6920HQ

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 1W instead of 46W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Processor 300 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Processor 300

2024

Why buy it

✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-6920HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,264 vs 7,269).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $82 MSRP, while Core i7-6920HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌4500% higher power demand at 46W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6920HQ better than Processor 300?

Yes. Core i7-6920HQ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-6920HQ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6920HQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-6920HQ is still the faster CPU overall, but Processor 300 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-6920HQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $82 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Processor 300 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (88.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor 300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2015) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of BGA1440. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-6920HQ vs Processor 300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6920HQ

The Core i7-6920HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,269 points. Launch price was $568.

Processor 300

The Processor 300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 7,264 points. Launch price was $82.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-6920HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Processor 300 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-6920HQ has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-6920HQ versus 3.9 GHz on the Processor 300 — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Processor 300 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i7-6920HQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Processor 300 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6920HQ scores 7,269 against the Processor 300's 7,264 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-6920HQ. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-6920HQ vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor 300.

Feature	Core i7-6920HQ	Processor 300
Cores / Threads	4 / 8+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	3.9 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.9 GHz+34%
L3 Cache	8 MB+33%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.25 MB (per core)+25%
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	7,269	7,264

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6920HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor 300 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.