Core i7-6920HQ vs Ryzen 5 2400GE

Core i7-6920HQ vs Ryzen 5 2400GE Performance Spectrum

Core i7-6920HQ

4 / 8

7,269

+0.4%

7,237

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6920HQ vs Ryzen 5 2400GE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6920HQ vs Ryzen 5 2400GE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6920HQ

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 2400GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400GE.

Ryzen 5 2400GE

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 11, while Core i7-6920HQ needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-6920HQ.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,237 vs 7,269).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Core i7-6920HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6920HQ better than Ryzen 5 2400GE?

Yes. Core i7-6920HQ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6920HQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-6920HQ is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i7-6920HQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 2400GE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 7,237 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 2400GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-6920HQ vs Ryzen 5 2400GE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6920HQ

The Core i7-6920HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,269 points. Launch price was $568.

Ryzen 5 2400GE

The Ryzen 5 2400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,237 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-6920HQ and Ryzen 5 2400GE share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-6920HQ versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2400GE — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-6920HQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2400GE uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6920HQ scores 7,269 against the Ryzen 5 2400GE's 7,237 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-6920HQ. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-6920HQ vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2400GE.

Feature	Core i7-6920HQ	Ryzen 5 2400GE
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	8 MB+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark	7,269	7,237
Geekbench 6 Single	—	826
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,847

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6920HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 2400GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-6920HQ	Ryzen 5 2400GE
Socket	BGA1440	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	—	64 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-6920HQ) / Yes (Ryzen 5 2400GE). The Ryzen 5 2400GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 11), while the Core i7-6920HQ requires a dedicated GPU.