
Core i7-6950X

Xeon E5-2687W v4
Core i7-6950X vs Xeon E5-2687W v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-6950X vs Xeon E5-2687W v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-6950X vs Xeon E5-2687W v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-6950X
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $418 less on MSRP ($1,723 MSRP vs $2,141 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.2 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($1,723 MSRP vs $2,141 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 160W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,580 vs 17,640).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2687W v4, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2687W v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 10.2 PassMark/$ ($2,141 MSRP vs $1,723 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-6950X better than Xeon E5-2687W v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-6950X vs Xeon E5-2687W v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6950X
The Core i7-6950X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-E (2016) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,580 points. Launch price was $1,723.

Xeon E5-2687W v4
The Xeon E5-2687W v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,640 points. Launch price was $2,141.
Processing Power
The Core i7-6950X packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E5-2687W v4 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2687W v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-6950X versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W v4 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-6950X (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-6950X uses the Broadwell-E (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2687W v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6950X scores 17,580 against the Xeon E5-2687W v4's 17,640 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2687W v4. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-6950X vs 30 MB on the Xeon E5-2687W v4.
| Feature | Core i7-6950X | Xeon E5-2687W v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20 | 12 / 24+20% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+14% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total) | 30 MB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+8433% | 3 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell-E (2016) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 17,580 | 17,640 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,063 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,255 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i7-6950X | Xeon E5-2687W v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1536 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-6950X) / Yes (Xeon E5-2687W v4).
| Feature | Core i7-6950X | Xeon E5-2687W v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-6950X was priced at $1723, while the Xeon E5-2687W v4 came in at $2141. On launch pricing ($1723 vs $2141), Core i7-6950X was $418 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6950X delivers 10.2 pts/$ vs 8.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2687W v4 — making the Core i7-6950X the 21.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-6950X | Xeon E5-2687W v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1723-20% | $2141 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.2+24% | 8.2 |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















