Core i7-7600U vs FX-6100

Core i7-7600U vs FX-6100 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-7600U

2 / 4

3,687

0.0%

3,686

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7600U vs FX-6100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7600U vs FX-6100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7600U

2017

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

FX-6100

2011

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,686 vs 3,687).
❌Launch MSRP is still $165 MSRP, while Core i7-7600U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7600U better than FX-6100?

Yes. Core i7-7600U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7600U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7600U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-7600U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $165 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. FX-6100 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (22.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7600U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-7600U vs FX-6100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7600U

The Core i7-7600U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,687 points. Launch price was $393.

FX-6100

The FX-6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,686 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-7600U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6100 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6100 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-7600U versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-6100 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-7600U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-6100 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7600U scores 3,687 against the FX-6100's 3,686 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-7600U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-7600U vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-6100.

Feature	Core i7-7600U	FX-6100
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.3 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	4 MB	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	6 MB+1100%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	3,687	3,686

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7600U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6100 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.