Core i7-7660U
VS
Core i7-2720QM

Core i7-7660U vs Core i7-2720QM

Intel

Core i7-7660U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 4 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i7-2720QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-7660U is positioned at rank 550 and the Core i7-2720QM is on rank 1062, so the Core i7-7660U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-7660U

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
99%
#538
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
723%
#539
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
712%
#540
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
654%
#541
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
651%
#542
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
645%
#544
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
623%
#545
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
597%
#546
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
596%
#547
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
580%
#550
Core i7-7660U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2720QM

#1050
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2763%
#1051
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2722%
#1052
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2499%
#1053
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2488%
#1054
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2465%
#1056
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2380%
#1057
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2282%
#1058
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2279%
#1059
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2218%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
99%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
98%
#1067
Athlon II N350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
98%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
97%
#1073
A8 Pro-7150B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
97%
#1074
A9-9420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#1075
Celeron B730
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-7660U (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-7660UCore i7-2720QM
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2720QM (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-7660UCore i7-2720QM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-7660U and Core i7-2720QM

Intel

Core i7-7660U

The Core i7-7660U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,059 points. Launch price was $415.

Intel

Core i7-2720QM

The Core i7-2720QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,015 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The Core i7-7660U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2720QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-2720QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-7660U versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-2720QM — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-7660U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-7660U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2720QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7660U scores 4,059 against the Core i7-2720QM's 4,015 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-7660U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,150 vs 700, a 48.6% lead for the Core i7-7660U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,285 vs 2,600 (12.9% advantage for the Core i7-2720QM). L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-7660U vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2720QM.

FeatureCore i7-7660UCore i7-2720QM
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
4 GHz+21%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+14%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
4,059+1%
4,015
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,759
Geekbench 6 Single
1,150+64%
700
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,285
2,600+14%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7660U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2720QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i7-7660U versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-2720QM — the Core i7-7660U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i7-7660U) vs 16 (Core i7-2720QM) — the Core i7-2720QM offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i7-7660U) and HM65,HM67,QM67 (Core i7-2720QM).

FeatureCore i7-7660UCore i7-2720QM
Socket
BGA1356
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Iris Plus 640 (Core i7-7660U) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2720QM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-7660U targets Productivity, Core i7-2720QM targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-7660U rivals Core i5-8250U; Core i7-2720QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.

FeatureCore i7-7660UCore i7-2720QM
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Plus 640
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Productivity
Performance Laptop