Core i7-840QM vs Pentium G3420

Intel

Core i7-840QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium G3420

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-840QM vs Pentium G3420 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-840QM vs Pentium G3420 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-840QM vs Pentium G3420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-840QM

2010

Why buy it

  • +0.1% higher PassMark.
  • +166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Draws 45W instead of 54W, a 9W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium G3420

2013

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (2,022 vs 2,025).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
    • Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Core i7-840QM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • 20% higher power demand at 54W vs 45W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i7-840QM better than Pentium G3420?
    Yes. Core i7-840QM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-840QM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i7-840QM is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-840QM comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G3420 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (23.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium G3420 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Core i7-840QM vs Pentium G3420 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i7-840QM

    The Core i7-840QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,025 points. Launch price was $568.

    Intel

    Pentium G3420

    The Pentium G3420 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,022 points. Launch price was $252.

    Processing Power

    The Core i7-840QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Pentium G3420 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i7-840QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-840QM versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium G3420 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.86 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-840QM uses the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G3420 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-840QM scores 2,025 against the Pentium G3420's 2,022 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-840QM. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-840QM vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3420.

    FeatureCore i7-840QMPentium G3420
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 8+100%
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    3.2 GHz
    3.2 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.86 GHz
    3.2 GHz+72%
    L3 Cache
    8 MB (total)+167%
    3 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    256 kB (per core)
    256 kB (per core)
    Process
    45 nm
    22 nm-51%
    Architecture
    Clarksfield (2009−2010)
    Haswell (2013−2015)
    PassMark
    2,025
    2,022
    Geekbench 6 Single
    390
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    1,050
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i7-840QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G3420 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i7-840QMPentium G3420
    Socket
    PGA988
    LGA1150
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1333
    Max RAM Capacity
    8 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-840QM) / not specified (Pentium G3420). Primary use case: Core i7-840QM targets Laptop.

    FeatureCore i7-840QMPentium G3420
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    Target Use
    Laptop