Core i7-8500Y vs Pentium Dual Core T3200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-8500Y vs Pentium Dual Core T3200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-8500Y vs Pentium Dual Core T3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-8500Y

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,590 vs 3,600).
❌400% higher power demand at 5W vs 1W.

Pentium Dual Core T3200

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 5W, a 4W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $64 MSRP, while Core i7-8500Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Dual Core T3200 better than Core i7-8500Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-8500Y is ahead with a 2.7% average FPS lead across 30 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core T3200 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core T3200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium Dual Core T3200 is the better buy right now. Pentium Dual Core T3200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $64 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-8500Y is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.7% average FPS lead across 30 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (56.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-8500Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-8500Y vs Pentium Dual Core T3200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-8500Y

The Core i7-8500Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,590 points. Launch price was $393.

Pentium Dual Core T3200

The Pentium Dual Core T3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 3,600 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-8500Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium Dual Core T3200's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-8500Y versus 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 — a 71% clock advantage for the Core i7-8500Y. The Core i7-8500Y uses the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-8500Y scores 3,590 against the Pentium Dual Core T3200's 3,600 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T3200.

Feature	Core i7-8500Y	Pentium Dual Core T3200
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+110%	2 GHz
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	3,590	3,600
Geekbench 6 Single	—	235
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	408