Core i7-8500Y vs PRO A10-8770

Core i7-8500Y vs PRO A10-8770 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-8500Y

2 / 4

3,590

+1.2%

3,547

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-8500Y vs PRO A10-8770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-8500Y vs PRO A10-8770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-8500Y

2018

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 5W instead of 65W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A10-8770 across 29 shared CPU benchmark tests.

PRO A10-8770

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 29 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,547 vs 3,590).
❌1200% higher power demand at 65W vs 5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-8500Y better than PRO A10-8770?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A10-8770 is ahead with a 4.8% average FPS lead across 29 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-8500Y pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-8500Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-8500Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-8500Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-8500Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-8500Y vs PRO A10-8770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-8500Y

The Core i7-8500Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,590 points. Launch price was $393.

PRO A10-8770

The PRO A10-8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,547 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-8500Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A10-8770 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A10-8770 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-8500Y versus 3.8 GHz on the PRO A10-8770 — a 10% clock advantage for the Core i7-8500Y (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-8500Y uses the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture (14 nm), while the PRO A10-8770 uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-8500Y scores 3,590 against the PRO A10-8770's 3,547 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-8500Y.

Feature	Core i7-8500Y	PRO A10-8770
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+11%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	3.5 GHz+133%
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	2048 kB+300%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	3,590+1%	3,547

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-8500Y uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A10-8770 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.