
Core i7-8665UE

Processor N95
Core i7-8665UE vs Processor N95 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-8665UE vs Processor N95 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-8665UE vs Processor N95: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-8665UE
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 620, while Processor N95 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 29.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1528 with DDR4, while Processor N95 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Processor N95
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 152.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1528 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8665UE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,783 vs 4,852).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-8665UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-8665UE better than Processor N95?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-8665UE vs Processor N95 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-8665UE
The Core i7-8665UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $409.

Processor N95
The Processor N95 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 4,783 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i7-8665UE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Processor N95's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-8665UE versus 3.4 GHz on the Processor N95 — a 25.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-8665UE (base: 1.7 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The Core i7-8665UE uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Processor N95 uses Alder Lake-N (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-8665UE scores 4,852 against the Processor N95's 4,783 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i7-8665UE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-8665UE vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor N95.
| Feature | Core i7-8665UE | Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+29% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz+1600% | 0.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB (total)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| PassMark | 4,852+1% | 4,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-8665UE uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor N95 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-8665UE | Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1528 | FCBGA1264 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-8665UE) / not specified (Processor N95). The Core i7-8665UE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 620), while the Processor N95 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-8665UE targets Embedded.
| Feature | Core i7-8665UE | Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 620 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Embedded | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-8665UE was priced at $409, while the Processor N95 came in at $160. On launch pricing ($409 vs $160), Processor N95 was $249 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-8665UE delivers 11.9 pts/$ vs 29.9 pts/$ for the Processor N95 — making the Processor N95 the 86.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-8665UE | Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409 | $160-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.9 | 29.9+151% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














