Core i3-7320 vs Core i7-8665UE

Intel

Core i3-7320

2 Cores4 Thrd51 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i7-8665UE

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2018

Core i3-7320 vs Core i7-8665UE Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7320 vs Core i7-8665UE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7320 vs Core i7-8665UE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7320

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $310 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 311.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 48.8 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
  • βœ…Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-8665UE.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8665UE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (4,831 vs 4,852).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
  • ❌240% higher power demand at 51W vs 15W.

Core i7-8665UE

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
  • βœ…Draws 15W instead of 51W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 48.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-7320.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-8665UE better than Core i3-7320?
Yes. Core i7-8665UE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-8665UE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-8665UE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-8665UE is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-8665UE comes in 313.1% more expensive on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-7320 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 311.3% better value on paper (48.8 vs 11.9 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-8665UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2017), 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-7320 vs Core i7-8665UE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-7320

The Core i3-7320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,831 points. Launch price was $157.

Intel

Core i7-8665UE

The Core i7-8665UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $409.

⚑

Processing Power

The Core i3-7320 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-8665UE offers 4 cores / 8 threads β€” the Core i7-8665UE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-7320 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-8665UE β€” a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-8665UE (base: 4.1 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i3-7320 uses the Kaby Lake (2016βˆ’2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-8665UE uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018βˆ’2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7320 scores 4,831 against the Core i7-8665UE's 4,852 β€” a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-8665UE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7320 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-8665UE.

FeatureCore i3-7320Core i7-8665UE
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz+7%
Base Clock
4.1 GHz+141%
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016βˆ’2019)
Whiskey Lake-U (2018βˆ’2019)
PassMark
4,831
4,852
Geekbench 6 Single
1,388
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-7320 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-8665UE uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i3-7320Core i7-8665UE
Socket
LGA1151
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7320) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-8665UE). Both include integrated graphics β€” HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7320) and UHD Graphics 620 (Core i7-8665UE) β€” useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7320 targets Mainstream Desktop, Core i7-8665UE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-7320 rivals Ryzen 3 1300X.

FeatureCore i3-7320Core i7-8665UE
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 620
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mainstream Desktop
Embedded
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-7320 was priced at $99, while the Core i7-8665UE came in at $409. On launch pricing ($99 vs $409), Core i3-7320 was $310 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-7320 delivers 48.8 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-8665UE β€” making the Core i3-7320 the 121.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-7320Core i7-8665UE
MSRP
$99-76%
$409
Performance per Dollar
48.8+310%
11.9
Release Date
2017
2018

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.