
Core i3-7320

Core i7-8665UE
Core i3-7320 vs Core i7-8665UE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-7320 vs Core i7-8665UE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-7320 vs Core i7-8665UE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-7320
2017Why buy it
- β Costs $310 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- β Delivers 311.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 48.8 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-8665UE.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8665UE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (4,831 vs 4,852).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- β240% higher power demand at 51W vs 15W.
Core i7-8665UE
2018Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- β Draws 15W instead of 51W, a 36W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 48.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-7320.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-8665UE better than Core i3-7320?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-7320 vs Core i7-8665UE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7320
The Core i3-7320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016β2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,831 points. Launch price was $157.

Core i7-8665UE
The Core i7-8665UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018β2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The Core i3-7320 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-8665UE offers 4 cores / 8 threads β the Core i7-8665UE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-7320 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-8665UE β a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-8665UE (base: 4.1 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i3-7320 uses the Kaby Lake (2016β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-8665UE uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7320 scores 4,831 against the Core i7-8665UE's 4,852 β a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-8665UE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7320 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-8665UE.
| Feature | Core i3-7320 | Core i7-8665UE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 4.4 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+141% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016β2019) | Whiskey Lake-U (2018β2019) |
| PassMark | 4,831 | 4,852 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,388 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-7320 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-8665UE uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i3-7320 | Core i7-8665UE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA1528 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7320) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-8665UE). Both include integrated graphics β HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7320) and UHD Graphics 620 (Core i7-8665UE) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7320 targets Mainstream Desktop, Core i7-8665UE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-7320 rivals Ryzen 3 1300X.
| Feature | Core i3-7320 | Core i7-8665UE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 620 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Mainstream Desktop | Embedded |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-7320 was priced at $99, while the Core i7-8665UE came in at $409. On launch pricing ($99 vs $409), Core i3-7320 was $310 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-7320 delivers 48.8 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-8665UE β making the Core i3-7320 the 121.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-7320 | Core i7-8665UE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-76% | $409 |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.8+310% | 11.9 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














