Core i3-1005G1 vs Core i3-7320

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1005G1 vs Core i3-7320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1005G1 vs Core i3-7320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1005G1

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 51W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-7320 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,827 vs 4,831).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-7320.

Core i3-7320

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-1005G1.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Core i3-1005G1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌240% higher power demand at 51W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-7320 better than Core i3-1005G1?

Yes. Core i3-7320 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 13.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-7320 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7320 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-7320 is the better buy right now. Core i3-7320 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $99 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (48.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1005G1 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-1005G1 vs Core i3-7320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1005G1

The Core i3-1005G1 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,827 points. Launch price was $281.

Core i3-7320

The Core i3-7320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,831 points. Launch price was $157.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-1005G1 and Core i3-7320 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-1005G1 versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-7320 — a 18.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-7320 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Core i3-1005G1 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-7320 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1005G1 scores 4,827 against the Core i3-7320's 4,831 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-7320. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 603 vs 1,388, a 78.9% lead for the Core i3-7320 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-1005G1	Core i3-7320
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	4.1 GHz+21%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	4.1 GHz+242%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	4,827	4,831
Cinebench R23 Multi	2,319	—
Geekbench 6 Single	603	1,388+130%
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,605	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1005G1 uses the FCBGA1526 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7320 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 / LPDDR4-3733 on the Core i3-1005G1 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7320 — the Core i3-1005G1 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Ice Lake-U SoC (Core i3-1005G1) and B250,H270,Z270,Q250,Q270 (Core i3-7320).

Feature	Core i3-1005G1	Core i3-7320
Socket	FCBGA1526	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200 / LPDDR4-3733+33%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i3-1005G1 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i3-1005G1) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7320). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (Ice Lake) (Core i3-1005G1) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7320) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1005G1 targets Thin-and-light, Core i3-7320 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-7320 rivals Ryzen 3 1300X.

Feature	Core i3-1005G1	Core i3-7320
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics (Ice Lake)	HD Graphics 630
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x / VT-d / EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Thin-and-light	Mainstream Desktop