
Core i3-1005G1

Xeon X7460
Core i3-1005G1 vs Xeon X7460 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-1005G1 vs Xeon X7460 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-1005G1 vs Xeon X7460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-1005G1
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (Ice Lake), while Xeon X7460 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X7460 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X7460, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads.
Xeon X7460
2008Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,803 vs 4,827).
- ❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1005G1 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-1005G1 better than Xeon X7460?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-1005G1 vs Xeon X7460 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1005G1
The Core i3-1005G1 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,827 points. Launch price was $281.

Xeon X7460
The Xeon X7460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 September 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Dunnington (2008) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per module). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,803 points. Launch price was $2,729.
Processing Power
The Core i3-1005G1 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon X7460 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon X7460 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-1005G1 versus 0.67 GHz on the Xeon X7460 — a 134.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-1005G1 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Core i3-1005G1 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon X7460 uses Dunnington (2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1005G1 scores 4,827 against the Xeon X7460's 4,803 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-1005G1. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-1005G1 vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon X7460.
| Feature | Core i3-1005G1 | Xeon X7460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 6+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+407% | 0.67 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2.66 GHz+122% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+8433% | 3 MB (per module) |
| Process | 10 nm-78% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) | Dunnington (2008) |
| PassMark | 4,827 | 4,803 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 2,319 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 603 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,605 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-1005G1 uses the FCBGA1526 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X7460 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 / LPDDR4-3733 on the Core i3-1005G1 versus DDR2-667 on the Xeon X7460 — the Core i3-1005G1 supports 379.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-1005G1) vs 4 (Xeon X7460). Chipset compatibility: Ice Lake-U SoC (Core i3-1005G1) and Intel 7300 (Xeon X7460).
| Feature | Core i3-1005G1 | Xeon X7460 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1526 | PGA604 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 / LPDDR4-3733+380% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i3-1005G1 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i3-1005G1) vs VT-x (Xeon X7460). The Core i3-1005G1 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (Ice Lake)), while the Xeon X7460 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1005G1 targets Thin-and-light, Xeon X7460 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7460 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Core i3-1005G1 | Xeon X7460 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics (Ice Lake) | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x / VT-d / EPT | VT-x |
| Target Use | Thin-and-light | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













