Core i3-1005G1 vs Processor N95

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1005G1 vs Processor N95 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1005G1 vs Processor N95: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1005G1

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (Ice Lake), while Processor N95 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1526 with DDR4, while Processor N95 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Processor N95

2023

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1526 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,783 vs 4,827).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core i3-1005G1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1005G1 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-1005G1 better than Processor N95?

Yes. Core i3-1005G1 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1005G1 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-1005G1 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i3-1005G1 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Processor N95 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 2.9% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor N95 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1526, and 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-1005G1 vs Processor N95 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1005G1

The Core i3-1005G1 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,827 points. Launch price was $281.

Processor N95

The Processor N95 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 4,783 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-1005G1 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Processor N95 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Processor N95 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-1005G1 versus 3.4 GHz on the Processor N95 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.2 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The Core i3-1005G1 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Processor N95 uses Alder Lake-N (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1005G1 scores 4,827 against the Processor N95's 4,783 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-1005G1. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-1005G1 vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor N95.

Feature	Core i3-1005G1	Processor N95
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz+1100%	0.1 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (total)
Process	10 nm	10 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)	Alder Lake-N (2023)
PassMark	4,827	4,783
Cinebench R23 Multi	2,319	—
Geekbench 6 Single	603	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,605	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1005G1 uses the FCBGA1526 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor N95 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-1005G1	Processor N95
Socket	FCBGA1526	FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200 / LPDDR4-3733	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i3-1005G1) / not specified (Processor N95). The Core i3-1005G1 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (Ice Lake)), while the Processor N95 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1005G1 targets Thin-and-light.