Core i3-7320 vs Xeon Bronze 3204
Core i3-7320
Xeon Bronze 3204
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-7320 is positioned at rank 434 and the Xeon Bronze 3204 is on rank 572, so the Core i3-7320 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7320
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Bronze 3204
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-7320 | Xeon Bronze 3204 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-7320 | Xeon Bronze 3204 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-7320 and Xeon Bronze 3204
Core i3-7320
The Core i3-7320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,831 points. Launch price was $157.
Xeon Bronze 3204
The Xeon Bronze 3204 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 4,797 points. Launch price was $213.
Processing Power
The Core i3-7320 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Bronze 3204 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon Bronze 3204 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-7320 versus 1.9 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3204 — a 73.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-7320 (base: 4.1 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i3-7320 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Bronze 3204 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7320 scores 4,831 against the Xeon Bronze 3204's 4,797 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-7320. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7320 vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon Bronze 3204.
| Feature | Core i3-7320 | Xeon Bronze 3204 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 6+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+116% | 1.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+116% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8.25 MB+106% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 6 MB+2300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 4,831 | 4,797 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,388 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-7320 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Bronze 3204 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7320 versus 2133 on the Xeon Bronze 3204 — the Xeon Bronze 3204 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Bronze 3204 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 64 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-7320) vs 6 (Xeon Bronze 3204). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-7320) vs 48 (Xeon Bronze 3204) — the Xeon Bronze 3204 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B250,H270,Z270,Q250,Q270 (Core i3-7320) and C621 (Xeon Bronze 3204).
| Feature | Core i3-7320 | Xeon Bronze 3204 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | 2133+53225% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+6553500% | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 48+200% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Bronze 3204 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7320) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Bronze 3204). The Core i3-7320 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon Bronze 3204 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7320 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-7320 rivals Ryzen 3 1300X; Xeon Bronze 3204 rivals EPYC 7232P.
| Feature | Core i3-7320 | Xeon Bronze 3204 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Mainstream Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-7320 and Xeon Bronze 3204
