Core i3-7320 vs Xeon X7460

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7320 vs Xeon X7460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7320 vs Xeon X7460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7320

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 51W instead of 130W, a 79W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Xeon X7460 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon X7460.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X7460, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Xeon X7460 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X7460

2008

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-7320 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,803 vs 4,831).
❌154.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 51W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7320 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-7320.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-7320 better than Xeon X7460?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X7460 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-7320 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-7320 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7320 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-7320 is the better buy right now. Core i3-7320 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $99 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (48.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7320 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-7320 vs Xeon X7460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7320

The Core i3-7320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,831 points. Launch price was $157.

Xeon X7460

The Xeon X7460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 September 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Dunnington (2008) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per module). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,803 points. Launch price was $2,729.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-7320 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon X7460 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon X7460 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-7320 versus 0.67 GHz on the Xeon X7460 — a 143.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-7320 (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Core i3-7320 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X7460 uses Dunnington (2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7320 scores 4,831 against the Xeon X7460's 4,803 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-7320. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7320 vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon X7460.

Feature	Core i3-7320	Xeon X7460
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+512%	0.67 GHz
Base Clock	4.1 GHz+54%	2.66 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+8433%	3 MB (per module)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Dunnington (2008)
PassMark	4,831	4,803
Geekbench 6 Single	1,388	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-7320 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X7460 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7320 versus DDR2-667 on the Xeon X7460 — the Core i3-7320 supports 259.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-7320) vs 4 (Xeon X7460). Chipset compatibility: B250,H270,Z270,Q250,Q270 (Core i3-7320) and Intel 7300 (Xeon X7460).

Feature	Core i3-7320	Xeon X7460
Socket	LGA1151	PGA604
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+260%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7320) vs VT-x (Xeon X7460). The Core i3-7320 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon X7460 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7320 targets Mainstream Desktop, Xeon X7460 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i3-7320 rivals Ryzen 3 1300X; Xeon X7460 rivals Core i7-980X.