Core i3-7320 vs Xeon X7460
Core i3-7320
Xeon X7460
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-7320 is positioned at rank 434 and the Xeon X7460 is on rank 571, so the Core i3-7320 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7320
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X7460
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-7320 | Xeon X7460 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Dunnington (2008) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-7320 | Xeon X7460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-7320 and Xeon X7460
Core i3-7320
The Core i3-7320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,831 points. Launch price was $157.
Xeon X7460
The Xeon X7460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 September 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Dunnington (2008) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per module). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,803 points. Launch price was $2,729.
Processing Power
The Core i3-7320 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon X7460 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon X7460 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-7320 versus 0.67 GHz on the Xeon X7460 — a 143.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-7320 (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Core i3-7320 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X7460 uses Dunnington (2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7320 scores 4,831 against the Xeon X7460's 4,803 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-7320. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7320 vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon X7460.
| Feature | Core i3-7320 | Xeon X7460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 6+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+512% | 0.67 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+54% | 2.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 3 MB (per module)+1100% |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Dunnington (2008) |
| PassMark | 4,831 | 4,803 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,388 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-7320 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X7460 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7320 versus DDR2-667 on the Xeon X7460 — the Core i3-7320 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-7320) vs 4 (Xeon X7460). Chipset compatibility: B250,H270,Z270,Q250,Q270 (Core i3-7320) and Intel 7300 (Xeon X7460).
| Feature | Core i3-7320 | Xeon X7460 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | PGA604 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+100% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7320) vs VT-x (Xeon X7460). The Core i3-7320 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon X7460 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7320 targets Mainstream Desktop, Xeon X7460 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i3-7320 rivals Ryzen 3 1300X; Xeon X7460 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Core i3-7320 | Xeon X7460 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x |
| Target Use | Mainstream Desktop | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-7320 and Xeon X7460
