
Core i7-880

Phenom II X6 1065T
Core i7-880 vs Phenom II X6 1065T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-880 vs Phenom II X6 1065T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-880 vs Phenom II X6 1065T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-880
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Phenom II X6 1065T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 8.0 PassMark/$ ($583 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
Phenom II X6 1065T
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $157 less on MSRP ($426 MSRP vs $583 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 36.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 5.9 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $583 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-880 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,412 vs 3,429).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-880.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-880 better than Phenom II X6 1065T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-880 vs Phenom II X6 1065T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-880
The Core i7-880 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,429 points. Launch price was $583.

Phenom II X6 1065T
The Phenom II X6 1065T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,412 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-880 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1065T offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1065T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.73 GHz on the Core i7-880 versus 3.4 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1065T — a 9.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-880 (base: 3.06 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-880 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1065T uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-880 scores 3,429 against the Phenom II X6 1065T's 3,412 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-880. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-880 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1065T.
| Feature | Core i7-880 | Phenom II X6 1065T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.73 GHz+10% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.06 GHz+6% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Lynnfield (2009−2010) | Thuban (2010) |
| PassMark | 3,429 | 3,412 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 507 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,478 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-880 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X6 1065T uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-880 | Phenom II X6 1065T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1156 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-880) / not specified (Phenom II X6 1065T).
| Feature | Core i7-880 | Phenom II X6 1065T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-880 was priced at $583, while the Phenom II X6 1065T came in at $426. On launch pricing ($583 vs $426), Phenom II X6 1065T was $157 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-880 delivers 5.9 pts/$ vs 8.0 pts/$ for the Phenom II X6 1065T — making the Phenom II X6 1065T the 30.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-880 | Phenom II X6 1065T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $583 | $426-27% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.9 | 8.0+36% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















