Core i7-920 vs FX-8800P

Core i7-920 vs FX-8800P Performance Spectrum

Core i7-920

4 / 8

2,866

+1.2%

Pentium Dual Core T2370

2,833

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-920 vs FX-8800P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-920 vs FX-8800P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-920

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 15W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 18.9 PassMark/$ ($284 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

FX-8800P

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $134 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $284 MSRP).
✅Delivers 87.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.9 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $284 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-920 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,833 vs 2,866).
❌1400% higher power demand at 15W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-920 better than FX-8800P?

Yes. Core i7-920 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-920 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-920 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i7-920 comes in 89.3% more expensive on MSRP at $284 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. FX-8800P only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 6.3% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-8800P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-920 vs FX-8800P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-920

The Core i7-920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,866 points. Launch price was $340.

FX-8800P

The FX-8800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,833 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-920 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the FX-8800P's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.93 GHz on the Core i7-920 versus 3.4 GHz on the FX-8800P — a 14.8% clock advantage for the FX-8800P (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-920 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the FX-8800P uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-920 scores 2,866 against the FX-8800P's 2,833 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-920.

Feature	Core i7-920	FX-8800P
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.93 GHz	3.4 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.66 GHz+27%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Bloomfield (2008−2010)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,866+1%	2,833

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-920 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-8800P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-920	FX-8800P
Socket	LGA1366	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-920 was priced at $284, while the FX-8800P came in at $150. On launch pricing ($284 vs $150), FX-8800P was $134 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-920 delivers 10.1 pts/$ vs 18.9 pts/$ for the FX-8800P — making the FX-8800P the 60.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-920	FX-8800P
MSRP	$284	$150-47%
Performance per Dollar	10.1	18.9+87%
Release Date	2008	2015

Search Core i7-920 on Amazon

Search FX-8800P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.