Core i7-920 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-56

Core i7-920 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-56 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-920

4 / 8

2,866

+1.1%

Pentium Dual Core T2370

2,835

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-920 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-56 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-920 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-56: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-920

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $284 MSRP, while Turion 64 X2 TL-56 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Turion 64 X2 TL-56

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-920 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,835 vs 2,866).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-920 better than Turion 64 X2 TL-56?

Yes. Core i7-920 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-920 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.5% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-920 is the better buy right now. Core i7-920 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $284 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-920 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-56 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-920

The Core i7-920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,866 points. Launch price was $340.

Turion 64 X2 TL-56

The Turion 64 X2 TL-56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Trinidad / Tyler (2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90/65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,835 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-920 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Turion 64 X2 TL-56 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i7-920 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.93 GHz on the Core i7-920 versus 1.8 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-56 — a 47.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-920. The Core i7-920 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-56 uses Trinidad / Tyler (2007) (90/65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-920 scores 2,866 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-56's 2,835 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-920.

Feature	Core i7-920	Turion 64 X2 TL-56
Cores / Threads	4 / 8+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.93 GHz+63%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.66 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	45 nm-50%	90/65 nm
Architecture	Bloomfield (2008−2010)	Trinidad / Tyler (2007)
PassMark	2,866+1%	2,835

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-920 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-56 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.