Core i7-920XM
VS
Athlon II X4 620

Core i7-920XM vs Athlon II X4 620

Intel

Core i7-920XM

4 Cores8 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2009
VS
AMD

Athlon II X4 620

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-920XM is positioned at rank 876 and the Athlon II X4 620 is on rank 789, so the Athlon II X4 620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-920XM

#864
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1457%
#865
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1435%
#866
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1318%
#867
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1312%
#868
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1300%
#870
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1255%
#871
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1204%
#872
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1202%
#873
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1169%
#876
Core i7-920XM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#877
Microsoft SQ1
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
100%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
100%
#882
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#884
Athlon II N330
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#889
Core i7-7820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
98%
#890
Celeron 7305
MSRP: $128|Avg: $107
98%
#891
E-300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 620

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15235%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14396%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10453%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3149%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2494%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2182%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1250%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1233%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1123%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1123%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1110%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1080%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1065%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1061%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1051%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
96%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
100%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#789
Athlon II X4 620
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
100%
#791
Core i7-3820
MSRP: $286|Avg: $30
99%
#792
Athlon II X3 425
MSRP: $79|Avg: $5
99%
#793
Athlon II X2 255
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#794
Core i3-3245
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
98%
#796
FX-4170
MSRP: $157|Avg: $23
97%
#798
Athlon II X3 415e
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
97%
#799
Core i5-2300
MSRP: $177|Avg: $17
96%
#800
Core i7-4820K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $40
96%
#802
Core i7-3770K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $75
96%
#803
Core i5-4460T
MSRP: $187|Avg: $30
95%
#804
Core i3-3220
MSRP: $117|Avg: $88
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-920XM leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon II X4 620 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-920XMAthlon II X4 620
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clarksfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-920XMAthlon II X4 620
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-920XM and Athlon II X4 620

Intel

Core i7-920XM

The Core i7-920XM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,014 points. Launch price was $1,054.

AMD

Athlon II X4 620

The Athlon II X4 620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,026 points. Launch price was $65.

Processing Power

The Core i7-920XM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Athlon II X4 620's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-920XM versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X4 620 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-920XM (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-920XM uses the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon II X4 620 uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-920XM scores 2,014 against the Athlon II X4 620's 2,026 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II X4 620. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-920XM vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 620.

FeatureCore i7-920XMAthlon II X4 620
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+23%
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Clarksfield (2009−2010)
Propus (2009−2011)
PassMark
2,014
2,026
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-920XM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X4 620 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core i7-920XM versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 620 — the Core i7-920XM supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X4 620 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-920XM) vs 0 (Athlon II X4 620) — the Core i7-920XM offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: PM55,HM55,QM57 (Core i7-920XM) and AMD AM3 (Athlon II X4 620).

FeatureCore i7-920XMAthlon II X4 620
Socket
PGA988
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1333+44333%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8
32 GB+419430300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-920XM) / not specified (Athlon II X4 620). Direct competitor: Core i7-920XM rivals Core i7-2720QM.

FeatureCore i7-920XMAthlon II X4 620
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true