
Core i7-930 vs Athlon Silver 3050e

Core i7-930

Athlon Silver 3050e
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-930 is positioned at rank 996 and the Athlon Silver 3050e is on rank 699, so the Athlon Silver 3050e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-930
Performance Per Dollar Athlon Silver 3050e
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-930 | Athlon Silver 3050e |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($60) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Dali (Zen) (2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-930 | Athlon Silver 3050e |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+201%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($60) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-930 and Athlon Silver 3050e

Core i7-930
The Core i7-930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 February 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.06 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,993 points. Launch price was $80.

Athlon Silver 3050e
The Athlon Silver 3050e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,979 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-930 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Athlon Silver 3050e offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-930 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.06 GHz on the Core i7-930 versus 2.8 GHz on the Athlon Silver 3050e — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-930 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Core i7-930 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon Silver 3050e uses Dali (Zen) (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-930 scores 2,993 against the Athlon Silver 3050e's 2,979 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-930. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-930 vs 4 MB on the Athlon Silver 3050e.
| Feature | Core i7-930 | Athlon Silver 3050e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.06 GHz+9% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+100% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Dali (Zen) (2020) |
| PassMark | 2,993 | 2,979 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 1,175 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 758 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,494 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-930 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon Silver 3050e uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core i7-930 versus 2400 on the Athlon Silver 3050e — the Athlon Silver 3050e supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon Silver 3050e supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 24 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 3 (Core i7-930) vs 2 (Athlon Silver 3050e). PCIe lanes: 36 (Core i7-930) vs 8 (Athlon Silver 3050e) — the Core i7-930 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i7-930 | Athlon Silver 3050e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | 2400+79900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 24 GB+78643100% | 32 |
| RAM Channels | 3+50% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 36+350% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-930) vs true (Athlon Silver 3050e). The Athlon Silver 3050e includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Core i7-930 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-930 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-930 | Athlon Silver 3050e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-930 launched at $294 MSRP, while the Athlon Silver 3050e debuted at $100. At current prices ($20 vs $60), the Core i7-930 is $40 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-930 delivers 149.7 pts/$ vs 49.6 pts/$ for the Athlon Silver 3050e — making the Core i7-930 the 100.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-930 | Athlon Silver 3050e |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $294 | $100-66% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-67% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 149.7+202% | 49.6 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















