Core i7-930 vs PRO A10-8770E

Core i7-930 vs PRO A10-8770E Performance Spectrum

Core i7-930

4 / 8

2,993

0.0%

3,001

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Ryzen AI Max 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-930 vs PRO A10-8770E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-930 vs PRO A10-8770E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-930

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
✅Delivers 34.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.2 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (36 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,993 vs 3,001).
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.

PRO A10-8770E

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-930 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 10.2 PassMark/$ ($395 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A10-8770E better than Core i7-930?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-930 is ahead with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, PRO A10-8770E pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A10-8770E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A10-8770E is still the much better call for a fresh build. PRO A10-8770E comes in 34.4% more expensive on MSRP at $395 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. Core i7-930 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 34.0% better value on paper (10.2 vs 7.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1366.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A10-8770E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-930 vs PRO A10-8770E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-930

The Core i7-930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 February 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.06 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,993 points. Launch price was $80.

PRO A10-8770E

The PRO A10-8770E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,001 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-930 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the PRO A10-8770E's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.06 GHz on the Core i7-930 versus 3.5 GHz on the PRO A10-8770E — a 13.4% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8770E (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-930 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the PRO A10-8770E uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-930 scores 2,993 against the PRO A10-8770E's 3,001 — a 0.3% lead for the PRO A10-8770E.

Feature	Core i7-930	PRO A10-8770E
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.06 GHz	3.5 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Bloomfield (2008−2010)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,993	3,001

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-930 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A10-8770E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-930	PRO A10-8770E
Socket	LGA1366	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	24 GB	—
RAM Channels	3	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	36	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-930) / not specified (PRO A10-8770E). Primary use case: Core i7-930 targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i7-930	PRO A10-8770E
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-930 was priced at $294, while the PRO A10-8770E came in at $395. On launch pricing ($294 vs $395), Core i7-930 was $101 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-930 delivers 10.2 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the PRO A10-8770E — making the Core i7-930 the 29.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-930	PRO A10-8770E
MSRP	$294-26%	$395
Performance per Dollar	10.2+34%	7.6
Release Date	2010	2016

Search Core i7-930 on Amazon

Search PRO A10-8770E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.