
Core i7-950

Core i7-2715QE
Core i7-950 vs Core i7-2715QE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-950 vs Core i7-2715QE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-950 vs Core i7-2715QE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-950
2009Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 8.5 PassMark/$ ($562 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2715QE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-2715QE
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $184 less on MSRP ($378 MSRP vs $562 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 47.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.5 vs 5.8 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $562 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Core i7-950 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,221 vs 3,250).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-950 better than Core i7-2715QE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-950 vs Core i7-2715QE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-950
The Core i7-950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,250 points. Launch price was $290.

Core i7-2715QE
The Core i7-2715QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,221 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-950 and Core i7-2715QE share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.33 GHz on the Core i7-950 versus 3 GHz on the Core i7-2715QE — a 10.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-950 (base: 3.06 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-950 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-2715QE uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-950 scores 3,250 against the Core i7-2715QE's 3,221 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-950. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-950 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2715QE.
| Feature | Core i7-950 | Core i7-2715QE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.33 GHz+11% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.06 GHz+46% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 3,250 | 3,221 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 587 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-950 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-2715QE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-950 | Core i7-2715QE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-950) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2715QE). The Core i7-2715QE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i7-950 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2715QE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i7-2715QE rivals Embedded R-Series.
| Feature | Core i7-950 | Core i7-2715QE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Embedded/Industrial |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-950 was priced at $562, while the Core i7-2715QE came in at $378. On launch pricing ($562 vs $378), Core i7-2715QE was $184 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-950 delivers 5.8 pts/$ vs 8.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-2715QE — making the Core i7-2715QE the 38.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-950 | Core i7-2715QE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $562 | $378-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.8 | 8.5+47% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














