Core i7-950 vs Pentium D1508

Intel

Core i7-950

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.33 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium D1508

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-950 vs Pentium D1508 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-950 vs Pentium D1508 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-950 vs Pentium D1508: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-950

2009

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 30.6 PassMark/$ ($562 MSRP vs $106 MSRP).
  • 420% higher power demand at 130W vs 25W.

Pentium D1508

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $456 less on MSRP ($106 MSRP vs $562 MSRP).
  • Delivers 428.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.6 vs 5.8 PassMark/$ ($106 MSRP vs $562 MSRP).
  • Draws 25W instead of 130W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-950 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (3,240 vs 3,250).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-950 better than Pentium D1508?
Yes. Core i7-950 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-950 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-950 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-950 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i7-950 comes in 430.2% more expensive on MSRP at $562 MSRP versus $106 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium D1508 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 11.6% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium D1508 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-950 vs Pentium D1508 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-950

The Core i7-950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,250 points. Launch price was $290.

Intel

Pentium D1508

The Pentium D1508 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,240 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i7-950 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Pentium D1508 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-950 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.33 GHz on the Core i7-950 versus 2.6 GHz on the Pentium D1508 — a 24.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-950 (base: 3.06 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-950 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium D1508 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-950 scores 3,250 against the Pentium D1508's 3,240 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-950. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-950 vs 3 MB on the Pentium D1508.

FeatureCore i7-950Pentium D1508
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.33 GHz+28%
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.06 GHz+39%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+167%
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
3,250
3,240
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-950 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium D1508 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-950Pentium D1508
Socket
LGA1366
FCBGA1667
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-950 was priced at $562, while the Pentium D1508 came in at $106. On launch pricing ($562 vs $106), Pentium D1508 was $456 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-950 delivers 5.8 pts/$ vs 30.6 pts/$ for the Pentium D1508 — making the Pentium D1508 the 136.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-950Pentium D1508
MSRP
$562
$106-81%
Performance per Dollar
5.8
30.6+428%
Release Date
2009
2015

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.