Core i7-965
VS
Xeon W5580

Core i7-965 vs Xeon W5580

Intel

Core i7-965

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Xeon W5580

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-965 is positioned at rank 1086 and the Xeon W5580 is on rank 657, so the Xeon W5580 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-965

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
91145%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
86123%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
62532%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
18838%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
14922%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
13054%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
7477%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
7379%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
6719%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
6718%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
6643%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
6464%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
6373%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
6348%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
6290%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
100%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
97%
#1088
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
96%
#1089
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
96%
#1090
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
96%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
96%
#1092
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
95%
#1093
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
94%
#1094
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
90%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
88%
#1096
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
83%
#1097
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
76%
#1098
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
69%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
67%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
66%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
63%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W5580

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12013%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2268%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2015%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1557%
#388
EPYC 9254
MSRP: $3761|Avg: $1099
99%
#389
Xeon Gold 5220R
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1015
99%
#390
EPYC 9555P
MSRP: $7983|Avg: $6130
98%
#391
Xeon Gold 5218
MSRP: $1273|Avg: $500
98%
#392
EPYC 9374F
MSRP: $4850|Avg: $3466
98%
#393
Xeon Gold 6448Y
MSRP: $3583|Avg: N/A
98%
#394
EPYC 9454
MSRP: $5225|Avg: $576
97%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
97%
#657
Xeon W5580
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#669
Xeon E5645
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
97%
#670
Xeon X5672
MSRP: $300|Avg: $44
97%
#671
Xeon E5-4603
MSRP: $202|Avg: $80
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W5580 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-965Xeon W5580
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Gainestown (2009−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-965 ($40), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($40 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-965Xeon W5580
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-965 and Xeon W5580

Intel

Core i7-965

The Core i7-965 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,424 points. Launch price was $1,509.

Intel

Xeon W5580

The Xeon W5580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,459 points. Launch price was $102.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-965 and Xeon W5580 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Core i7-965 versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W5580 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-965 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon W5580 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-965 scores 3,424 against the Xeon W5580's 3,459 — a 1% lead for the Xeon W5580. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-965Xeon W5580
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.46 GHz
3.46 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark
3,424
3,459+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1366 socket with PCIe 2.0.

FeatureCore i7-965Xeon W5580
Socket
LGA1366
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0