
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core i7-10510Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +258.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Core i7-10510Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i7-10510Y
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,631 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
Core i7-9700K
2018Core i7-10510Y
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +258.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Core i7-10510Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,631 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Core i7-10510Y?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10510Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10510Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 71 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10510Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 91 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10510Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 91 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i7-10510Y

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i7-10510Y
Core i7-10510Y
The Core i7-10510Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,631 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-10510Y offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-10510Y — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-10510Y uses Comet Lake-Y (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i7-10510Y's 3,631 — a 119.4% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-10510Y.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10510Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+9% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+200% | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Comet Lake-Y (2019) |
| PassMark | 14,397+297% | 3,631 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,270 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,960 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-10510Y uses UTFCBGA1377 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus LPDDR3-2133 on the Core i7-10510Y — the Core i7-9700K supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 10 (Core i7-10510Y) — the Core i7-9700K offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and Comet Lake-Y (Core i7-10510Y).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10510Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | UTFCBGA1377 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+33% | LPDDR3-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+700% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+60% | 10 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Intel UHD Graphics 617 (Core i7-10510Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Core i7-10510Y targets Ultrabook/Tablet.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10510Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | Ultrabook/Tablet |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












