Core i7-9700K
VS
Xeon E5-2697 v2

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon E5-2697 v2

Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2697 v2

12 Cores24 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9700K

#259
Core i3-9100TE
MSRP: $122|Avg: $60
106%
#260
Core i5-12500T
MSRP: $302|Avg: $214
106%
#261
Core i9-13900
MSRP: $549|Avg: $599
105%
#262
Core i7-11700
MSRP: $323|Avg: $274
105%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
53%
#263
Core i9-13900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $570
104%
#264
Processor 300T
MSRP: $82|Avg: $82
103%
#265
Athlon 3000G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $60
103%
#266
Athlon 220GE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $60
103%
#267
Ryzen 9 3900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $441
102%
#268
Core i5-10500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $178
102%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
102%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
102%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
101%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
101%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
100%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
45%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
100%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
99%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
99%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
98%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
43%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
98%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
40%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
98%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
97%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
40%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
97%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
97%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
38%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2697 v2

#169
Xeon E-2356G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $544
104%
#171
Xeon W-2140B
MSRP: $294|Avg: $99
103%
#176
Xeon 6325P
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
102%
#178
Xeon Silver 4510
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
102%
#179
Xeon W-3223
MSRP: $294|Avg: $294
101%
#182
EPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
100%
#183
Xeon E5-2697 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#187
Xeon Gold 5520+
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
99%
#188
EPYC 8124P
MSRP: $639|Avg: $639
99%
#196
Xeon 6515P
MSRP: $740|Avg: $886
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-9700K (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-9700KXeon E5-2697 v2
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-9700KXeon E5-2697 v2
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Xeon E5-2697 v2

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Intel

Xeon E5-2697 v2

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 14,267 points. Launch price was $1,723.

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon E5-2697 v2's 14,267 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2697 v2.

FeatureCore i7-9700KXeon E5-2697 v2
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+40%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+33%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
30 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark
14,397
14,267
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 — the Core i7-9700K supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2697 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2697 v2). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2697 v2) — the Xeon E5-2697 v2 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2697 v2).

FeatureCore i7-9700KXeon E5-2697 v2
Socket
LGA1151
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666+33%
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
768 GB+500%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
40+150%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Xeon E5-2697 v2). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-9700KXeon E5-2697 v2
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop