
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core i7-10870H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $32 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
Core i7-10870H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,087 vs 14,397).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($417 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
Core i7-9700K
2018Core i7-10870H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $32 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,087 vs 14,397).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($417 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Core i7-10870H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10870H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10870H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 122 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10870H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 325 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10870H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i7-10870H

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i7-10870H
Core i7-10870H
The Core i7-10870H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,087 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i7-10870H's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10870H — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-10870H uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i7-10870H's 14,087 — a 2.2% lead for the Core i7-9700K. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10870H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+2% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+64% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Comet Lake-H (2020) |
| PassMark | 14,397+2% | 14,087 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,594 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,228 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 6,822 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-10870H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and WM490,HM470,QM480 (Core i7-10870H).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10870H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-10870H). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-10870H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Core i7-10870H targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-10870H rivals Ryzen 7 4800H.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10870H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Core i7-10870H debuted at $417. On MSRP ($385 vs $417), the Core i7-9700K is $32 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 33.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-10870H — making the Core i7-9700K the 10.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10870H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-8% | $417 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4+11% | 33.8 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












