
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core i7-11800H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 19,838).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Core i7-11800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
Core i7-11800H
2021Why buy it
- ✅+37.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-9700K
2018Core i7-11800H
2021Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅+37.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 19,838).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Core i7-11800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-11800H better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-11800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-11800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-11800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 320 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 217 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-11800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 337 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i7-11800H

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i7-11800H
Core i7-11800H
The Core i7-11800H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,838 points. Launch price was $395.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i7-11800H's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-11800H — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-11800H uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i7-11800H's 19,838 — a 31.8% lead for the Core i7-11800H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-11800H.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-11800H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+7% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+89% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm SuperFin-29% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 19,838+38% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 12,180 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,896 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 7,795 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-11800H uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 20 (Core i7-11800H) — the Core i7-11800H offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and QM580,HM570,WM590 (Core i7-11800H).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-11800H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i7-11800H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and UHD Graphics 750 (Core i7-11800H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Core i7-11800H targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-11800H rivals Ryzen 7 5800H.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-11800H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












