
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core i7-12700E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700E across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 28,302).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 90.1 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $314 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Core i7-12700E
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($314 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 141.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 90.1 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($314 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-9700K
2018Core i7-12700E
2022Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($314 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 141.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 90.1 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($314 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700E across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 28,302).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 90.1 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $314 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700E better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-12700E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-12700E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 123 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-12700E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 586 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 319 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-12700E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 635 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 589 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 538 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 381 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i7-12700E

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i7-12700E
Core i7-12700E
The Core i7-12700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 28,302 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-12700E offers 12 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-12700E has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-12700E — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-12700E uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i7-12700E's 28,302 — a 65.1% lead for the Core i7-12700E. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700E.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-12700E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 12 / 20+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+2% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+108% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 28,302+97% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 20,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,202 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,981 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-12700E uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-12700E — the Core i7-12700E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 20 (Core i7-12700E) — the Core i7-12700E offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and R680E,Q670,H610E (Core i7-12700E).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-12700E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-12700E). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Core i7-12700E targets Industrial Computing / Professional Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700E rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-12700E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | Industrial Computing / Professional Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Core i7-12700E debuted at $314. On MSRP ($385 vs $314), the Core i7-12700E is $71 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 90.1 pts/$ for the Core i7-12700E — making the Core i7-12700E the 82.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-12700E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385 | $314-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 90.1+141% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












