
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core i7-14700K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-14700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 52,228).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i7-14700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i7-14700K
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +50.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+175% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 241.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌6.2% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.
Core i7-9700K
2018Core i7-14700K
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +50.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+175% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 241.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-14700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 52,228).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i7-14700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌6.2% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-14700K better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-14700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 111 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-14700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 687 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 581 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 261 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-14700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 382 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 295 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-14700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 951 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 865 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 750 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 674 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 802 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 620 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 547 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 513 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 402 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i7-14700K

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i7-14700K
Core i7-14700K
The Core i7-14700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 52,228 points. Launch price was $319.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-14700K offers 20 cores / 28 threads — the Core i7-14700K has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.6 GHz on the Core i7-14700K — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-14700K uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i7-14700K's 52,228 — a 113.6% lead for the Core i7-14700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-14700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 20 / 28+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.6 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+6% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 33 MB (total)+175% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 52,228+263% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 36,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 21,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-14700K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-14700K — the Core i7-14700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-14700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 20 (Core i7-14700K) — the Core i7-14700K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and Z790,H770,B760,Z690,H670,B660,H610 (Core i7-14700K).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-14700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-14700K). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-14700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Core i7-14700K targets High-End Gaming/Creation.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-14700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | High-End Gaming/Creation |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Core i7-14700K debuted at $409. On MSRP ($385 vs $409), the Core i7-9700K is $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-14700K — making the Core i7-14700K the 109.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-14700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-6% | $409 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 127.7+241% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












