
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-10920X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $304 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $689 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 165W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i9-10920X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10920X across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 25,875).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 19 MB).
Core i9-10920X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +39.4% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60.4% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅175% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌79% HIGHER MSRP$689 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌73.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Core i9-10920X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $304 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $689 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 165W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i9-10920X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +39.4% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60.4% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅175% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10920X across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 25,875).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 19 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌79% HIGHER MSRP$689 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌73.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10920X better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-10920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-10920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 199 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-10920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 647 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 616 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 521 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-10920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 647 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 647 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 647 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 587 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 609 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 425 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i9-10920X

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i9-10920X
Core i9-10920X
The Core i9-10920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 25,875 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i9-10920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-10920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10920X — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-10920X uses Cascade Lake-X (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i9-10920X's 25,875 — a 57% lead for the Core i9-10920X. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10920X.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-10920X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+2% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 19.25 MB (total)+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Cascade Lake-X (2019) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 25,875+80% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 15,458 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,250 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-10920X uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Core i9-10920X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 4 (Core i9-10920X). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 44 (Core i9-10920X) — the Core i9-10920X offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and X299 (Core i9-10920X).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-10920X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 44+175% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-10920X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-10920X). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i9-10920X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Core i9-10920X targets HEDT/Workstation.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-10920X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | HEDT/Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Core i9-10920X debuted at $689. On MSRP ($385 vs $689), the Core i7-9700K is $304 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 37.6 pts/$ for the Core i9-10920X — making the Core i9-10920X the 0.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-10920X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-44% | $689 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 37.6 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












