
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-11900T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $54 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $439 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900T across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 18,620).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $439 MSRP).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
Core i9-11900T
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 13.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.4 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($439 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌14% HIGHER MSRP$439 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
Core i7-9700K
2018Core i9-11900T
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $54 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $439 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 13.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.4 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($439 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900T across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 18,620).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $439 MSRP).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌14% HIGHER MSRP$439 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-11900T better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-11900T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-11900T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 122 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-11900T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 324 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-11900T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 423 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i9-11900T

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i9-11900T
Core i9-11900T
The Core i9-11900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,620 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i9-11900T's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i9-11900T — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-11900T uses Rocket Lake (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i9-11900T's 18,620 — a 25.6% lead for the Core i9-11900T. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900T.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-11900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+140% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Rocket Lake (2021) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 18,620+29% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,200 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-11900T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 20 (Core i9-11900T) — the Core i9-11900T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i9-11900T).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-11900T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-11900T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Intel UHD Graphics 750 (Core i9-11900T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Core i9-11900T targets Low Power High Perf Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-11900T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | Low Power High Perf Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Core i9-11900T debuted at $439. On MSRP ($385 vs $439), the Core i7-9700K is $54 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 42.4 pts/$ for the Core i9-11900T — making the Core i9-11900T the 12.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-11900T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-12% | $439 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 42.4+13% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












