
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-12900K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $204 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $589 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 41,180).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 69.9 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $589 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i9-12900K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i9-12900K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 87.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.9 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($589 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌53% HIGHER MSRP$589 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.
Core i7-9700K
2018Core i9-12900K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $204 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $589 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 87.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.9 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($589 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 41,180).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 69.9 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $589 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i9-12900K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌53% HIGHER MSRP$589 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-12900K better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 94 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 636 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 482 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 244 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 776 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 620 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 560 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 900 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 817 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 706 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 637 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 529 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 534 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 378 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i9-12900K

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i9-12900K
Core i9-12900K
The Core i9-12900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 41,180 points. Launch price was $589.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i9-12900K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-12900K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-12900K — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-12900K uses Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i9-12900K's 41,180 — a 96.4% lead for the Core i9-12900K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 16 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.2 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 41,180+186% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-12900K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR5-4800 on the Core i9-12900K — the Core i9-12900K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 20 (Core i9-12900K) — the Core i9-12900K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i9-12900K).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Core i9-12900K). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-12900K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Core i9-12900K debuted at $589. On MSRP ($385 vs $589), the Core i7-9700K is $204 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 69.9 pts/$ for the Core i9-12900K — making the Core i9-12900K the 60.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-35% | $589 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 69.9+87% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












