
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-13900KF
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $214 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i9-13900KF needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900KF across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 57,743).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 96.4 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900KF moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i9-13900KF
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +61.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 157.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 96.4 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌55.6% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Core i9-13900KF
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $214 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i9-13900KF needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +61.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 157.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 96.4 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900KF across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 57,743).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 96.4 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900KF moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌55.6% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900KF better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-13900KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 112 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-13900KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 756 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 658 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 635 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 390 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 270 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-13900KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 628 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 426 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 336 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-13900KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 1034 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 926 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 812 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 722 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 757 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 663 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 582 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 634 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 503 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i9-13900KF

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i9-13900KF
Core i9-13900KF
The Core i9-13900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 W, 253 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,743 points. Launch price was $564.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i9-13900KF offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900KF has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-13900KF — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900KF (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-13900KF uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i9-13900KF's 57,743 — a 120.2% lead for the Core i9-13900KF. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900KF.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-13900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 24 / 32+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.7 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 57,743+301% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 39,565 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,946 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,878 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-13900KF uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900KF — the Core i9-13900KF supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-13900KF supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 20 (Core i9-13900KF) — the Core i9-13900KF offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and Intel Z790,Intel Z690 (Core i9-13900KF).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-13900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs true (Core i9-13900KF). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i9-13900KF requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Core i9-13900KF targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-13900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Core i9-13900KF debuted at $599. On MSRP ($385 vs $599), the Core i7-9700K is $214 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 96.4 pts/$ for the Core i9-13900KF — making the Core i9-13900KF the 88.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-13900KF |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-36% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 96.4+158% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












