
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-14900HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $283 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14900HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 44,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 66.9 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ❌72.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 55W.
Core i9-14900HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +44.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 78.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.9 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 95W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌73.5% HIGHER MSRP$668 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
Core i7-9700K
2018Core i9-14900HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $283 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +44.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 78.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.9 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 95W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14900HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 44,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 66.9 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ❌72.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌73.5% HIGHER MSRP$668 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-14900HX better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 109 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 355 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 180 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 761 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 542 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 334 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 896 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 783 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 696 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 829 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 639 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 612 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 425 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i9-14900HX

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i9-14900HX
Core i9-14900HX
The Core i9-14900HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 44,685 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i9-14900HX offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-14900HX has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-14900HX — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900HX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-14900HX uses Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i9-14900HX's 44,685 — a 102.5% lead for the Core i9-14900HX. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900HX.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 24 / 32+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.7 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+64% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 44,685+210% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 35,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 17,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-14900HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i9-14900HX — the Core i9-14900HX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-14900HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 20 (Core i9-14900HX) — the Core i9-14900HX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and HM770,WM790 (Core i9-14900HX).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA1964 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-14900HX). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-14900HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Core i9-14900HX targets Flagship Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | Flagship Gaming Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Core i9-14900HX debuted at $668. On MSRP ($385 vs $668), the Core i7-9700K is $283 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 66.9 pts/$ for the Core i9-14900HX — making the Core i9-14900HX the 56.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-42% | $668 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 66.9+79% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












