
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-14900KS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $364 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 150W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14900KS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 60,531).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 80.8 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i9-14900KS moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i9-14900KS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +67.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 116.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 80.8 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌94.5% HIGHER MSRP$749 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌57.9% higher power demand at 150W vs 95W.
Core i7-9700K
2018Core i9-14900KS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $364 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 150W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +67.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 116.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 80.8 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14900KS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 60,531).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 80.8 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i9-14900KS moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌94.5% HIGHER MSRP$749 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌57.9% higher power demand at 150W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-14900KS better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-14900KS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 110 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-14900KS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 790 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 688 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 550 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 400 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 312 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 275 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-14900KS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 794 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 660 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 572 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 711 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 352 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-14900KS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 1089 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 975 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 853 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 760 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 899 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 791 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 690 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 607 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 592 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i9-14900KS

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i9-14900KS
Core i9-14900KS
The Core i9-14900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Marchar 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.9 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,531 points. Launch price was $689.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i9-14900KS offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-14900KS has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.9 GHz on the Core i9-14900KS — a 18.5% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900KS (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-14900KS uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i9-14900KS's 60,531 — a 123.1% lead for the Core i9-14900KS. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900KS.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-14900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 24 / 32+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.9 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 60,531+320% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-14900KS uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus 5600 on the Core i9-14900KS — the Core i9-14900KS supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-14900KS supports up to 192 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 20 (Core i9-14900KS) — the Core i9-14900KS offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and Z790,Z690 (Core i9-14900KS).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-14900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | 5600+139900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+69904967% | 192 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-14900KS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900KS rivals Ryzen 9 7950X.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-14900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Core i9-14900KS debuted at $749. On MSRP ($385 vs $749), the Core i7-9700K is $364 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 80.8 pts/$ for the Core i9-14900KS — making the Core i9-14900KS the 73.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-14900KS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-49% | $749 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 80.8+116% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












