
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-7900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $614 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 78.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 20.9 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 140W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i9-7900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 20,907).
Core i9-7900X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+45.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅175% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.9 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌47.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Core i9-7900X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $614 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 78.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 20.9 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 140W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i9-7900X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+45.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅175% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 20,907).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.9 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌47.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Core i9-7900X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-7900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-7900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 163 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-7900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 248 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-7900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 523 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 523 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 423 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i9-7900X

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i9-7900X
Core i9-7900X
The Core i9-7900X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 14 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,907 points. Launch price was $999.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i9-7900X offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-7900X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-7900X — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-7900X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i9-7900X's 20,907 — a 36.9% lead for the Core i9-7900X. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 14 MB (total) on the Core i9-7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-7900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+9% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 14 MB (total)+17% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 20,907+45% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,323 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,536 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-7900X uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 4 (Core i9-7900X). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 44 (Core i9-7900X) — the Core i9-7900X offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and X299 (Core i9-7900X).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-7900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 44+175% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-7900X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i9-7900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Core i9-7900X targets High-End Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-7900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | High-End Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Core i9-7900X debuted at $999. On MSRP ($385 vs $999), the Core i7-9700K is $614 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 20.9 pts/$ for the Core i9-7900X — making the Core i7-9700K the 56.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-7900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-61% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4+79% | 20.9 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












