
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-9900KS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $128 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $513 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 127W, a 32W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i9-9900KS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900KS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 19,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Core i9-9900KS
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌33.2% HIGHER MSRP$513 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌33.7% higher power demand at 127W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Core i9-9900KS
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $128 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $513 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 127W, a 32W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i9-9900KS needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900KS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 19,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌33.2% HIGHER MSRP$513 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌33.7% higher power demand at 127W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-9900KS better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 192 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 454 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 283 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 485 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 485 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 440 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 380 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i9-9900KS

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i9-9900KS
Core i9-9900KS
The Core i9-9900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 127 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,397 points. Launch price was $513.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i9-9900KS's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5 GHz on the Core i9-9900KS — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i9-9900KS (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). Both are built on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i9-9900KS's 19,397 — a 29.6% lead for the Core i9-9900KS. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900KS.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 19,397+35% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1151 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Core i9-9900KS). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i9-9900KS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Core i9-9900KS debuted at $513. On MSRP ($385 vs $513), the Core i7-9700K is $128 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 37.8 pts/$ for the Core i9-9900KS — making the Core i9-9900KS the 1.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-25% | $513 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 37.8+1% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












