Core i7-9700K vs Core i9-9980HK

Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i9-9980HK

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

  • +3.1% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i9-9980HK needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9980HK across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Core i9-9980HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.

Core i9-9980HK

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (13,966 vs 14,397).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-9980HK better than Core i7-9700K?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i9-9980HK is ahead with a 4.8% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K pulls ahead with 3.1% better PassMark. Core i9-9980HK also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the better fit. You are getting 3.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i9-9980HK is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Core i9-9980HK is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-9700K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (37.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-9980HK is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i7-9700KCore i9-9980HK
1080p
low308 FPS271 FPS
medium278 FPS246 FPS
high231 FPS207 FPS
ultra182 FPS179 FPS
1440p
low270 FPS235 FPS
medium221 FPS193 FPS
high178 FPS158 FPS
ultra143 FPS139 FPS
4K
low170 FPS165 FPS
medium140 FPS137 FPS
high108 FPS106 FPS
ultra95 FPS93 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i7-9700KCore i9-9980HK
1080p
low360 FPS349 FPS
medium321 FPS349 FPS
high291 FPS349 FPS
ultra259 FPS349 FPS
1440p
low324 FPS349 FPS
medium282 FPS349 FPS
high258 FPS349 FPS
ultra225 FPS323 FPS
4K
low249 FPS349 FPS
medium221 FPS310 FPS
high208 FPS291 FPS
ultra179 FPS245 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i7-9700KCore i9-9980HK
1080p
low360 FPS349 FPS
medium360 FPS349 FPS
high360 FPS349 FPS
ultra360 FPS349 FPS
1440p
low360 FPS349 FPS
medium360 FPS349 FPS
high360 FPS349 FPS
ultra360 FPS349 FPS
4K
low360 FPS349 FPS
medium360 FPS349 FPS
high360 FPS349 FPS
ultra318 FPS322 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i7-9700KCore i9-9980HK
1080p
low360 FPS349 FPS
medium360 FPS349 FPS
high360 FPS349 FPS
ultra360 FPS349 FPS
1440p
low360 FPS349 FPS
medium360 FPS349 FPS
high360 FPS349 FPS
ultra360 FPS349 FPS
4K
low360 FPS349 FPS
medium360 FPS349 FPS
high360 FPS349 FPS
ultra360 FPS349 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i9-9980HK

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Intel

Core i9-9980HK

The Core i9-9980HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,966 points. Launch price was $583.

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i9-9980HK's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5 GHz on the Core i9-9980HK — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i9-9980HK (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-9980HK uses Coffee Lake-HR (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i9-9980HK's 13,966 — a 3% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9980HK.

FeatureCore i7-9700KCore i9-9980HK
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz
5 GHz+2%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+50%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Coffee Lake-HR (2019)
PassMark
14,397+3%
13,966
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-9980HK uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-9700KCore i9-9980HK
Socket
LGA1151
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Core i9-9980HK). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i9-9980HK requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-9700KCore i9-9980HK
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop