PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-9700K vs Core i9-9980XE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-9700K vs Core i9-9980XE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,594 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $1,979 MSRP).
✅Delivers 154.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 14.7 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $1,979 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 165W, a 70W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i9-9980XE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 29,127).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).

Core i9-9980XE

2018

Why buy it

✅+102.3% higher PassMark.
✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
✅175% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($1,979 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
❌73.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 95W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-9980XE better than Core i7-9700K?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-9700K is ahead with a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-9980XE pulls ahead with 102.3% better PassMark. Core i9-9980XE also has the bigger cache pool with 106.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-9980XE is the stronger fit. You are getting 102.3% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 106.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-9980XE is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i9-9980XE comes in 414.0% more expensive on MSRP at $1,979 MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it still gives you 102.3% better PassMark. Core i7-9700K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 154.1% better value on paper (37.4 vs 14.7 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-9980XE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 106.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 18 cores / 36 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-9700K vs Core i9-9980XE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i9-9980XE

The Core i9-9980XE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 29,127 points. Launch price was $1,979.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i9-9980XE offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Core i9-9980XE has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9980XE — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-9980XE uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i9-9980XE's 29,127 — a 67.7% lead for the Core i9-9980XE. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Core i9-9980XE.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Core i9-9980XE
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+9%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+20%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	24.75 MB (total)+106%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	14,397	29,127+102%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	22,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,459
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	12,177

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-9980XE uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 4 (Core i9-9980XE). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 44 (Core i9-9980XE) — the Core i9-9980XE offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and X299 (Core i9-9980XE).

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Core i9-9980XE
Socket	LGA1151	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	44+175%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-9980XE supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i9-9980XE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Core i9-9980XE targets HEDT / Workstation / Content Creation. Direct competitor: Core i9-9980XE rivals Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Core i9-9980XE
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Desktop	HEDT / Workstation / Content Creation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-9700K was priced at $385, while the Core i9-9980XE came in at $1979. On launch pricing ($385 vs $1979), Core i7-9700K was $1594 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 14.7 pts/$ for the Core i9-9980XE — making the Core i7-9700K the 87% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Core i9-9980XE
MSRP	$385-81%	$1979
Performance per Dollar	37.4+154%	14.7
Release Date	2018	2018

Search Core i7-9700K on Amazon

Search Core i9-9980XE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.